Issue 439791003: account_payment_sepa: Validate signature date

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Issue 439791003: account_payment_sepa: Validate signature date

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
1 year ago by nicoe

Modified:
1 year ago

Reviewers:
ced, reviewbot

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

account_payment_sepa: Validate signature date issue11897

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 6

Created: 1 year ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+53 lines, -1 line)			Patch
M	modules/account_payment_sepa/exceptions.py	View	1 chunk	+9 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download
M	modules/account_payment_sepa/message.xml	View	1 chunk	+3 lines, -0 lines	1 comment	Download
M	modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py	View	2 chunks	+41 lines, -0 lines	5 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 3

Expand All Messages | Collapse All Messages

reviewbot

patch is not applicable URL: https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003

1 year ago (2022-11-18 18:19:29 UTC) #2

ced

1 year ago (2022-11-18 18:37:06 UTC) #3

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
File modules/account_payment_sepa/message.xml (right):

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
modules/account_payment_sepa/message.xml:31: <field name="text">The mandate
"%(mandate)s" is using a signature date in the future.</field>
For me "is using" is not correct because it is a not an event but it is a fact
so it should be  like for stock "The mandate has a signature date in the
future".

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
File modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py (right):

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py:691:
cls._validate_signature_date(records, field_names)
As this is a temporal condition, for me it is better to enforce it only on
validated transition.

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py:712: raise_warning = user_id == 0 or
account_group in user.groups
Finally I'm wondering if using a warning for everyone is not simpler. This is
not that much critical.

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py:713: tomorrow = Date.today() +
datetime.timedelta(days=1)
Should compute today with the mandate company in the context.

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py:714: for mandate in records:
I think it is better to make a unique warning for all the records.

https://codereview.tryton.org/439791003/diff/420151003/modules/account_paymen...
modules/account_payment_sepa/payment.py:717: warning_name = '%s.signature_date'
% mandate
Use Warning.format

Expand All Messages | Collapse All Messages